Yet again: we need a clear message
To Do Next for the #NeverAgain Movement: Settle on a Clear Demand
Social Justice and Activism
by Ted Rall | April 5, 2018 - 5:22am
Adapted by Daffyd ap Morgen
Ted Rall, the editorial cartoonist and columnist, is the author of “Francis: The People’s Pope.”
Social Justice and Activism
by Ted Rall | April 5, 2018 - 5:22am
Adapted by Daffyd ap Morgen
- A huge turnout will not lead to new gun legislation.
- Victory is achievable when rallies sharpen their focus.
- Movements need enthusiasm and careful strategizing to sustain and grow.
- Congress and the president ignore one-off events of large groups of Americans carrying signs, and chanting slogans.
- Sustained movements must be organized around a message.
- Social media can bring large groups of people together quickly.
- But they also need a simple, coherent, bumper-sticker-ready demand message.
- The 10 printed demands for the March on Washington remind us of American society’s failure to address the needs of the poor and oppressed since 1963.
- They had a clear, coherent set of demands, beginning with: “Comprehensive and effective Civil Rights legislation from the present Congress — without compromise or filibuster — to guarantee all Americans:
- Access to all public accommodations, decent housing, adequate and integrated education, the right to vote.”
- The Civil Rights Act was passed.
- The March 24th March for Our Lives did not articulate a precise demand or set of demands.
- Mission statement: “School safety is not a political issue.
- [We] demand that a comprehensive and effective bill be immediately brought before Congress to address these gun issues.”
- Congress won't effectively “address” this issue.
- A movement must have an area of clear focus,
- #NeverAgain has that part down pat.
- An effective movement must have the solution to a problem.
- Having a clear solution entails risk.
- #NeverAgain advocating for a comprehensive gun ban will push away allies who prefer a compromise approach.
- Yet a moderate approach will generate less excitement among those in favor of a radical solution (and moderation generally elicits less enthusiasm).
- It’s better to go into battle with half an army than a whole one riddled with confusion and no idea why they’re fighting.
Ted Rall, the editorial cartoonist and columnist, is the author of “Francis: The People’s Pope.”
Comments
Post a Comment